There may be times when a contractor or subcontractor uses workers to commit benefit fraud. This may involve supplying off-record/undeclared labour, some of whom may be collusive in the fraud, but others may be unaware their identity has been used.
In one multi-agency operation at a high-profile publicly funded construction site, it was clear that the end user did the bare minimum to review its supply chain. Home Office Immigration Enforcement identified over 20 individuals without the right to work on site. HMRC and partner agencies found a number of the workforce were exploited by an unscrupulous gangmaster and, amongst other things, were being paid well below the National Minimum Wage. CIS identities (e.g., UTRs) were being used simultaneously across multiple sites in the UK.
This can impact UK critical infrastructure (e.g., delays to public projects) and create quality risks (e.g., cost-cutting with inferior materials).
Using non-compliant labour providers can lead to:
- Adverse publicity and association with criminals and modern slavery.
- Use of workers without the right to work and complicity risks in labour exploitation.
- Significant loss of revenue due to adverse publicity and service problems on high-profile sites.
- Share value and dividends can be affected.
In this example, due diligence by all parties did not protect:
- The project.
- The end user.
- The business involved.
- The workforce.
The personal wealth of the perpetrators of fraud and modern slavery is significant and is accumulated at the expense of others. It is a moral duty to stand against this.