This is an HMRC illustrative example showing how tax fraud can manifest in outsourced security guard services.
In this case, an end user procured security services from a provider using a contingent workforce with outsourced payroll functions. During a due diligence visit, HMRC examined the supply chain and uncovered several red flags, including:
- Significant debt within the supply chain.
- Missing workforce records.
- Failure to submit required returns.
Undercharging as a Warning Sign
Even before HMRC’s visit, the end user had concerns. They were being charged £9.90/hour, which was below a minimum viable costed rate of about £10.96 per hour used in that period for compliance analysis (excluding any profit margin).
Rates vary with NMW/NLW, AWR parity, holiday pay method, pension and on-costs—so treat a low charge rate as a red flag to investigate, not proof on its own.
A charge rate below this threshold makes it highly unlikely that a supplier could:
- Pay workers lawfully (including NMW/NLW and holiday pay).
- Meet Income Tax and NIC obligations.
- Cover employer NICs and other statutory/on-costs.
This raised serious concerns around tax non-compliance.
HMRC Intervention and Outcome
Despite early warnings, the end user did not act sufficiently on HMRC’s advice. As a result, HMRC took strong enforcement action, leading to significant consequences for everyone in the supply chain.
Ultimately, the end user brought all security guards onto their direct payroll to prevent further risk and non-compliance.
Key Lessons from the Case
- Even small contracts can form part of a much larger organised fraud, potentially involving millions of pounds.
- “Phoenix” companies are often used by fraudsters to walk away from debts—HMRC is frequently the largest unpaid creditor.
- Fraudulent providers gain unfair commercial advantage by undercutting competitors through unpaid taxes and cutting corners on worker protections.
- Tolerance of phoenix suppliers by end users and large businesses enables this cycle of fraud and undermines effective intervention.