News · End-Hirers & Agencies · OPRaaS Platform
Workforce turnover is a permanent feature of how large construction projects are staffed. People move between sites, subcontractors and payroll arrangements from one month to the next, and a scheme that starts the year with one crew can finish it with several.
A new report from Mace Construct puts a price on that movement. Writing on 1 July 2026 for Construction Management, Nicky Roger reports that the contractor’s Build Smart, Build Better study, drawn from more than 200 projects, estimates workforce turnover is costing the industry over £1.3bn a year in lost productivity, rising to almost £20,000 in lost output an hour on the largest schemes.
The report frames workforce turnover as lost knowledge and coordination. For anyone assuring a labour supply chain, that same movement carries a second cost. Every worker who leaves and is replaced restarts a compliance record, and that record has to be rebuilt correctly each time.
What the Mace report measures, and what it leaves out
Mace’s estimate is a productivity number. On its analysis, projects employing around 500 workers can lose roughly £2,266 in output an hour to workforce turnover, and that figure climbs steeply on the largest infrastructure schemes. The £1.3bn is the annual gap Mace suggests exists between projects with high and low workforce turnover across the UK pipeline.
The argument behind the number matters more than the number itself. Mace’s executive chair, Mark Reynolds, argues that the sector has to stop treating site labour as if it were endlessly interchangeable, because when workers leave a major site the project loses knowledge, coordination and momentum. Productivity, the report suggests, is largely settled before work starts, in design decisions, procurement strategy and how well the supply chain is integrated.
What the productivity view does not price is the compliance work that the same workforce turnover creates. A replacement worker is not only a gap in output. Each one is a fresh set of checks that a main contractor or its recruitment agency has to complete and be able to show. That cost rarely appears in a productivity report, but it falls on the same organisations.
Why a new face restarts the compliance clock
Consider what has to happen every time a worker is replaced. Their right to work has to be verified. Their employment status has to be established, because it decides how they are paid and taxed: agency worker, umbrella employee, self-employed subcontractor or a worker through their own company. For subcontractors, their status under the Construction Industry Scheme has to be checked with HMRC before a payment is made.
These checks are not optional, and they do not carry over from the last person in the role. Where workforce turnover is high, the volume simply multiplies. A gap in that record is not a vacancy that fills itself. It is missing evidence, and missing evidence tends to surface at the worst moment, when HMRC, a client or an auditor asks who was on site, how they were engaged and how they were paid.
Why construction workforce turnover is hardest to evidence
This is sharper in construction than in almost any other sector. Construction carries one of the highest rates of self-employment of any UK industry, on Office for National Statistics labour market figures, and it leans heavily on subcontracting, agency supply and umbrella payroll. The OPRaaS Labour Supply Chain Assurance course notes that umbrella and project-based workers are especially common on construction schemes.
That reliance on movement is exactly what makes workforce turnover so hard to evidence in construction specifically. Layers of subcontractors sit beneath the main contractor, and HMRC has been clear that the business at the top of the chain is expected to have visibility of the tiers below it.
The OPRaaS course sets this out plainly for construction: verify the VAT and CIS position of subcontractors, follow the money through the chain, and treat weak oversight as a live exposure rather than a paperwork detail.
For a public sector infrastructure client, the same pattern runs through every framework supplier and every tier beneath them. The people delivering the work change constantly. The obligation to know who they are does not.
Turning a moving workforce into a live record
The answer to workforce turnover is not to freeze the workforce. It is to hold a record that stays current as the workforce moves. The OPRaaS course frames contingent-workforce tracking as a live control, and poses one test that cuts to the heart of it: can you produce a compliant headcount report within twenty-four hours for audit purposes?
Most organisations carrying heavy workforce turnover could not, because their record is rebuilt after the fact rather than kept live. A live record, by contrast, holds a small number of things per worker and keeps them current:
- A verified right to work and identity, dated, with a diary note for any time-limited status that needs re-checking.
- A confirmed employment status and paying entity, so it is clear at any point whether a worker is agency, umbrella, CIS subcontractor or engaged through their own company.
- The CIS verification reference for every subcontractor, held against the payments made to them.
- A reconciliation of the workforce list to timesheets, invoices and RTI, so the people on site match the people being paid.
Kept this way, a replacement worker is a new line on a maintained record, not a reason to reconstruct the whole picture.
How the OPRaaS Virtual Compliance Director keeps the record current
This is the work the OPRaaS Virtual Compliance Director (OPRaaS VCD) platform is built to carry. It embeds senior governance leadership into an end-hirer or agency without the cost of a full-time director, and builds audit-ready controls across right-to-work, IR35, CIS, GLAA and modern-slavery duties that stay current as workers and suppliers change.
Two examples make it concrete. Right to work, identity, employment status and CIS position are captured at onboarding and re-checked on a risk-based cadence, with every change written into the worker’s evidence record. Each supplier agency and umbrella is monitored against Companies House for director and ownership changes, and against Creditsafe for credit-risk moves such as county court judgments and financial-strength downgrades.
OPRaaS, On-Pay-Roll-as-a-Service, is a systemised governance and workforce management partner for organisations that rely on temporary, contractor and contingent labour, from recruitment agencies and end-hirers to umbrella companies, managed service providers and public sector buyers. It is approved on the UK Government Commercial Agency (formerly Crown Commercial Service) frameworks including RM6310 Audit & Assurance Services (Lots 2 & 4), RM6219 and RM6237 Learning & Training Services DPS.
Why lower workforce turnover is easier to assure
Mace’s own answer to workforce turnover is to invest in permanent capacity, direct employment and apprenticeships, and to reform procurement so that it rewards workforce stability. That case is made on productivity grounds. It holds on assurance grounds too.
A stable, directly employed workforce is simply easier to evidence than one that turns over every few weeks. Fewer onboarding events mean fewer chances for a right-to-work check or a CIS verification to be missed.
For end-hirers and public sector clients weighing how to assure their labour supply chain, workforce stability and supply chain assurance are two readings of the same decision. The harder the workforce is to keep still, the more the record has to do the standing still for it.
For construction end-hirers and the agencies that staff their sites, the operational version of this discipline sits in Module 3 of the OPRaaS Labour Supply Chain Assurance Self-Certification Course, where contingent-workforce tracking is treated as a live control rather than an annual reconciliation.
Every replacement worker is a fresh compliance record. Where workforce turnover is high, the question is not whether the checks were done, but whether you can show them.
Compliance is your asset. Evidenced daily.
Read next
“Own your compliance as an asset.“
Drawing on Nicky Roger, published on 1 July 2026 for Construction Management; the Mace Construct Build Smart, Build Better report; Office for National Statistics labour market data; HMRC guidance on the Construction Industry Scheme and right-to-work checks; and the OPRaaS LSCA Self-Certification Course Module 3.
Talk to OPRaaS about your supply chain.
Use the contact form in the sidebar to the right of this article, or email info@opraas.co.uk.
This article is editorial commentary by OPRaaS Limited (On-Pay-Roll-as-a-Service), drawing on published industry reporting. It is general information, not legal, tax, employment or compliance advice. Obligations vary by organisation and engagement. Speak to a qualified professional before acting on any specific position.