News · End-Hirers · OPRaaS Platform
Companies House reform has done something subtle but significant: it has changed what a check on a supplier at the register is really worth. For years, a labour supply chain buyer could look a company up, confirm it existed, note the directors and move on. That snapshot now tells you less than the people relying on it tend to assume.
The point was made well in an industry-insight piece by Bright, published on AccountingWEB on 26 June 2026. Writing for accountancy practices, Bright argues that company records are being treated with more weight, and that firms need to treat them that way too. The same shift matters to anyone who checks a supplier rather than files for one.
The scale is not small. Companies House estimates that six to seven million directors and people with significant control are in scope for identity verification under the Companies House reform programme. For an end-hirer or a recruitment agency, every one of those people might sit behind a labour supplier in the chain.
What Companies House reform actually changes
Companies House reform sits under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023, and it has turned a passive register into an active one. The registrar now has power to question, reject and remove information that looks wrong or suspicious, according to the GOV.UK transition plan. The register has started to push back.
Identity verification is the change buyers will feel first. Companies House has confirmed that verification became mandatory for new directors and new incorporations from 18 November 2025, with existing directors and PSCs required to verify across a transition expected to run to late 2026. Registered email addresses and lawful purpose statements sit alongside it. Taken together, the data on the register is meant to mean more than it used to.
Why a yearly register snapshot is not supplier due diligence
Here is the trap. Bright makes the point that, handled separately, each filing change looks manageable, but handled across a whole client base the risk builds quickly. The same is true of a supplier panel. A confirmation statement checked once a year says nothing about a director who changed last week, or a person with significant control who has still not verified.
A snapshot is a moment, not a record. When a buyer files that snapshot and assumes it still holds, the gap between what was checked and what is now true moves up the chain unnoticed. Companies House reform raises the ceiling on what the register can prove, which raises the floor on what good supplier due diligence has to do.
Where the supplier check gets tested in the chain
This is the territory Module 4 of the OPRaaS Labour Supply Chain Assurance course covers under its supplier due diligence topic, where the CAR principles (Check, Act, Review), HMRC’s GfC12 framework, set the shape of the work. Check means confirming a supplier’s legal obligations and financial stability. Review means continuous monitoring, not a one-off pass.
The course is specific about the Check. Drawing on HMRC guidance on supply chain due diligence, its labour-supplier topic asks an organisation to confirm the supplier is legitimate, to verify VAT registration through the GOV.UK checker, and to track changes in a supplier’s legal or financial status over time. Companies House reform makes the first of those checks more reliable. It does nothing for the second unless someone repeats it.
That recurrence is where the discipline lives. A verified director today can resign tomorrow, and an unverified one can still hold up a filing or signal a chain that has stopped keeping its records straight. The reform gives buyers better raw material; it does not do the looking for them.
How the OPRaaS Virtual Compliance Director evidences supplier checks
This is the work the OPRaaS Virtual Compliance Director (OPRaaS VCD) platform is built to carry. It embeds senior governance leadership into an end-hirer or recruitment agency without the cost of a full-time director, and it keeps a dated record of which supplier was checked, against what, and when.
Two examples make the point concrete. When a supplier joins the panel, the OPRaaS VCD platform verifies its identity and ownership against Companies House for director, PSC and ownership changes, and against Creditsafe for credit-risk moves such as county court judgments and financial-strength downgrades, writing both into the audit and evidence summary the platform produces on demand.
When the panel is already running, those same two checks are re-run on a defined cadence. A director change or a credit downgrade sharply comes into focus, rather than surfacing at the next annual review.
OPRaaS, On-Pay-Roll-as-a-Service, is a systemised governance and workforce management partner for organisations that rely on temporary, contractor and contingent labour, from recruitment agencies and end-hirers to umbrella companies, managed service providers and public sector buyers. Through its OPRaaS Virtual Compliance Director solutions it builds audit-ready controls across supplier due diligence, IR35, CIS, GLAA, modern slavery and HMRC labour supply chain expectations.
It is approved on the UK Government Commercial Agency (formerly Crown Commercial Service) frameworks including RM6310 Audit & Assurance Services (Lots 2 & 4), RM6219 and RM6237 Learning & Training Services DPS.
A register check takes minutes. Supplier due diligence is the standing evidence that the check happened, for every supplier, repeated as the facts behind it change.
What Companies House reform puts in front of boards
For board directors at end-hirers and the agencies they work with, the practical conclusion is narrow. The register is becoming a better source of truth, and that is good news. What it also does is remove the old excuse that a supplier check was only ever a formality.
The buyers who come out ahead will treat Companies House reform as a prompt to check identity and ownership properly, then to keep checking. They will hold dated proof of what they confirmed and when, rather than a printout filed and forgotten. The CAR principles in Module 4 of the OPRaaS LSCA course set out the operational version of that discipline, and the OPRaaS compliance-as-an-asset approach shows what the resulting evidence looks like.
Compliance is your asset. Evidenced daily.
Read next
“Verify, do not assume: what HMRC’s genuine-contact rule teaches labour supplier due diligence.“
Drawing on an industry-insight article by Bright, published on AccountingWEB on 26 June 2026; the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023; GOV.UK and Companies House guidance on identity verification and the reform transition plan; HMRC guidance on supply chain due diligence; and Module 4 of the OPRaaS LSCA Self-Certification Course.
Talk to OPRaaS about your supply chain.
Use the contact form in the sidebar to the right of this article, or email info@opraas.co.uk.
This article is editorial commentary by OPRaaS Limited (On-Pay-Roll-as-a-Service), drawing on published reporting and HMRC guidance. It is general information, not legal, tax, employment or compliance advice. Obligations vary by organisation and engagement. Speak to a qualified professional before acting on any specific position.