News · End-Hirers & Agencies · OPRaaS Platform
Employment rights compliance has just lost its ceiling. The cap on what an employment tribunal can award for unfair dismissal, previously the lower of a year’s gross pay or £123,543, has been removed, BDO reports, leaving employers with potentially uncapped liability. For any organisation that uses agency, temporary or contingent labour, that single change moves employment rights compliance from an HR task onto the board’s risk register.
The prompt is a fresh assessment of the reforms. Writing on 29 June 2026 for BDO, Jon Dee set out what the Employment Rights Act 2025 means for heads of internal audit, and argued that boards should be asking whether assurance over the new obligations belongs in this year’s audit plan. The piece is addressed to the audit committee, not the HR team. That shift in audience is the real signal.
What the Employment Rights Act 2025 actually changes
Start with the substance, because the Act moves on several fronts at once. The Employment Rights Act 2025, which received royal assent on 18 December 2025, reworks unfair dismissal, day-one rights, harassment duties and the treatment of zero-hours and agency work, with many provisions bedding-in across 2026 and 2027. The direction is settled even where the detail is not.
On the reading Jon Dee sets out, the headline changes group into four:
- Unfair dismissal protection available after six months of service rather than two years, expected from 1 January 2027, with the compensation cap removed and the time limit to bring a claim extended from three to six months from October 2026.
- Statutory sick pay payable from day one, and paternity and unpaid parental leave becoming day-one rights, already in force since April 2026.
- A wider duty on employers to take all reasonable steps on workplace harassment, including harassment by third parties such as customers or clients, expected from October 2026.
- Guaranteed-hours offers and reasonable-notice duties for zero-hours and agency workers, expected from 2027 and still subject to consultation and secondary legislation.
Much of the operational detail, Jon Dee notes, is still being filled in, so reference periods, qualifying conditions and notice standards are not all settled. What is clear is that employment rights compliance no longer sits only with a worker’s direct employer.
Why the new duties reach agency and contingent workers
This is where the duty moves up the chain. The Act extends the new protections to agency workers, and on Jon Dee’s reading many of the resulting obligations fall on the end-hirer rather than the agency that supplies them.
A guaranteed-hours offer to an agency worker has to reflect the highest pay they received in the reference period, or the pay of a comparable worker. Where a shift is cancelled at short notice, the agency makes the payment, but the cost is expected to pass to the hirer at fault.
The practical effect is one record with two owners. Neither a recruitment agency nor the end-hirer it supplies can answer for the worker’s hours on its own. That makes employment rights compliance a shared obligation by design.
This is not a niche population. Around 1.2 million people in the UK are on zero-hours contracts, the Office for National Statistics reports, and younger workers are far more likely to be among them. The same Act also creates the Fair Work Agency as a single body to enforce labour-market rights, which suggests the enforcement attention will follow.
Why uncapped liability raises the stakes for end-hirers
The reason this reaches the board is money and time. With the compensation cap gone, an unfair dismissal finding now carries open-ended cost, and from 1 January 2027 that protection is available after six months rather than two years. On BDO’s account, employees will also have six months rather than three to bring a claim. Together those changes widen both the number of people who can claim and the size of what they may be awarded.
A soft risk has become a hard one. Jon Dee’s answer is procedural: strengthen onboarding, probation and performance management, and train line managers, so that any decision to dismiss can be shown to be fair before the six-month point passes. For end-hirers and public sector buyers carrying large flexible workforces, employment rights compliance has to hold across suppliers, not just direct staff.
Employment rights compliance becomes an evidence question
Taken together, these reforms reward organisations that keep their workforce record current rather than reconstructing it when a claim arrives. Guaranteed hours depend on what a worker actually did over a reference period. Reasonable notice depends on a dated log of when a shift was offered or changed. A fair dismissal depends on a documented onboarding, probation and performance trail. In each case, employment rights compliance turns on evidence that has to exist already.
Compliance you cannot show is compliance you cannot prove. Across an agency and the hirers it supplies, that record has to be one both can stand behind. In practice it means holding, per worker:
- A current view of employment status and contract type for every agency, umbrella and contractor engagement, reviewed whenever the role, rate or end-client changes.
- A live count of hours worked across the rolling reference period, reconciled to timesheets and pay records, so a guaranteed-hours offer can be calculated rather than estimated.
- A dated log of shifts offered, changed or cancelled, with the notice given, so notice and short-notice-payment questions can be answered from evidence.
- A documented onboarding, probation and performance record, so a dismissal decision can be shown to have followed a fair procedure.
Where the OPRaaS LSCA course makes assurance operational
This is the territory the OPRaaS Labour Supply Chain Assurance Self-Certification Course covers in Module 3, on labour supply chain assurance. Its Contingent Workforce Tracking topic treats the workforce record as something kept live, with each worker correctly classified as agency, umbrella, contractor or self-employed, and third-party intermediaries verified rather than assumed. It poses a question the new liabilities make sharp: can you produce a compliant headcount report within twenty-four hours for audit purposes?
Assurance needs an owner and a cadence. The same module’s compliance-steps topic designates a Senior Responsible Owner and a named team, then systemises the checks on a risk-based cadence with a documented audit trail. The OPRaaS labour supply chain assurance methodology treats that review as a standing control, so when the law moves, the employment rights compliance record moves with it rather than waiting for the next annual tidy-up.
How the OPRaaS Virtual Compliance Director supports boards and agencies
The OPRaaS Virtual Compliance Director (OPRaaS VCD) platform embeds senior governance leadership into an end-hirer or recruitment agency without the cost of a full-time director. It builds audit-ready controls across IR35, CIS, GLAA, modern slavery and HMRC’s wider labour supply chain expectations, and keeps them current as engagements and the law change.
Two examples make it concrete. Right to work, identity, employment status and contract terms are captured at onboarding and re-checked on a risk-based cadence, with every change written into the worker’s evidence record. Each supplier agency and umbrella is monitored against Companies House for director and ownership changes, and against Creditsafe for credit-risk moves such as county court judgments and financial-strength downgrades.
OPRaaS, On-Pay-Roll-as-a-Service, is a systemised governance and workforce management partner for organisations that rely on temporary, contractor and contingent labour, from recruitment agencies and end-hirers to umbrella companies, managed service providers and public sector buyers. It is approved on the UK Government Commercial Agency (formerly Crown Commercial Service) frameworks including RM6310 Audit & Assurance Services (Lots 2 & 4), RM6219 and RM6237 Learning & Training Services DPS.
Why employment rights compliance belongs on the audit committee agenda
The reason this is an audit committee matter, not only an HR one, is that the obligations are now shared and the evidence is now dated. A board that uses flexible labour owns part of the employment rights compliance record even where another organisation holds some of the pieces. Public sector buyers feel this sharply, where NHS trusts, councils and multi-academy trusts run heavily on agency and zero-hours staff.
The exposure rarely arrives with warning. It surfaces when a guaranteed-hours offer is challenged, a short-notice payment is disputed, or a dismissal is taken to a tribunal, and the record has to be produced on the day. Jon Dee’s closing point is that heads of internal audit should be putting this on the audit committee agenda and asking whether assurance belongs in the annual plan.
For boards already managing IR35, right-to-work checks and modern-slavery duties across a contingent workforce, the Employment Rights Act 2025 adds another layer to the same employment rights compliance question: not whether the policy exists, but whether the evidence does. That is the line the audit plan now has to test.
The Act does not just change the rules. It changes what an organisation has to be able to show, and when.
Compliance is your asset. Evidenced daily.
Read next
“Own your compliance as an asset.“
Drawing on Jon Dee, published on 29 June 2026 for BDO; the Employment Rights Act 2025; Office for National Statistics data on zero-hours contracts; and the OPRaaS LSCA Self-Certification Course Module 3.
Talk to OPRaaS about your supply chain.
Use the contact form in the sidebar to the right of this article, or email info@opraas.co.uk.
This article is editorial commentary by OPRaaS Limited (On-Pay-Roll-as-a-Service), drawing on published industry reporting. It is general information, not legal, tax, employment or compliance advice. Obligations vary by organisation and engagement. Speak to a qualified professional before acting on any specific position.